Website skin: page width (min-with) is not respected with iPhone and IE10

A place for discussion about skinning and design. Before posting questions here you should review the documentation about creating skins.

This thread is closed to new posts. You must sign in to post in the forums.
3/19/2013 9:14:40 AM
Gravatar
Total Posts 149
Partner
mojoPortal Skinning, Custom Development and Support in Italy?
EffectiveWeb.it

Website skin: page width (min-with) is not respected with iPhone and IE10

I have recently published a mojoPortal website with a skin designed with Artisteer 4.0. (as I usuallly do)

For some reasons, this site behaves differently form the others.

The page width is set to 1000px but the iPhone (and IE10 when the screen size is reduced) does not respect the width and the content is misplaced.

This site's header contains a Nivo Slider presentation instead of a static image and I wonder if this may be the cause.

Style.css contains a "min-width" style attribute.

body {padding: 0;margin:0;min-width: 1000px;color: #4C4C34;}

which I suppose is not well supported by IE and iOS Safari (but iOS Chrome has the same problem).

Is there any CSS "trick" I can put in place to override this issue ?

Skin is temporarily published in our dvelopment site: http://mojoportal.effectiveweb.it

Thanks.

Diego

 

 

3/20/2013 3:57:20 PM
Gravatar
Total Posts 18439

Re: Website skin: page width (min-with) is not respected with iPhone and IE10

Hi Diego,

The latest Artisteer does this as part of their responsive design to adapt to smaller screens of tablets and phones.

I think if you try commenting out style.responsive.css from style.config and maybe also remove the script.responsive.js from layout.master then it will no longer do that. But Artisteer intends that to happen I think.

Hope that helps,

Joe

3/21/2013 4:30:37 AM
Gravatar
Total Posts 149
Partner
mojoPortal Skinning, Custom Development and Support in Italy?
EffectiveWeb.it

Re: Website skin: page width (min-with) is not respected with iPhone and IE10

Thanks Joe,

Now I can see.

I tried to customize style.responsive.css to fit with my custom design and some basic mojoPortal functions (e.g. topnav) and the result was decent but, in the end, I decided to follow your suggestion and comment out style.responsive.css from style.config and the script.responsive.js from layout.master.

In my opinion, the best mobile experience with mojoPortal is by using mobile-kit-pro.

Ciao

Diego

You must sign in to post in the forums. This thread is closed to new posts.