Joe,

     Thanks for looking into it.  I attempted to follow the documentation here, but with 'Name' and 'Content' being shown in the example, when I was presented with double the options for Content and Name in the 'wild', I didn't understand the application.  I'm still not sure I understand, as ridiculous as that sounds; it could be that I still don't know enough about meta tags.  I understand your classic 'foo-bar' example.  To use an actual example, setting the author would be:

• Content Property = author
• Content = John Doe

     ...it appears the 'Content Property' field in the current build have taken the place of the 'Name' field in the example... is that right?

     What I'm not understanding is where the similar 'Name Property' and 'Name' come into play then; what are the purposes of those fields if the Content fields handle it?  Is the difference the meta object vs a page property?  That's all I can put together based on what I'm reading.

     Regarding the bug and the proposed changes... I think that sounds like a good idea assuming the field wouldn't be filtered to only meta elements.  Having a quick/easy option to write a script or base element and add it to the page would be great.

     Thanks again for time you put in... always a big help.